Home Forums Tips, Tricks, Clips, and Pics What is verdict with the Tube EQ?

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #77664

    I’ve been thinking of getting a EQ pedal and the one that appeals to me at the moment is the Tube EQ since it has expression and it runs on tubes. But what is the overall verdict on this pedal? Is it noisy? Anyone have any experience with it?

    #92340
    Fender&EHX4ever
    Moderator

    I had one for about 6 months.

    Pros: The TubeEQ did a great job of beefing up, and warming up my tone, especially with low ouptut single coils or humbuckers, though it worked well with high output pups as well. Using the expression pedal, you can easily set the notch so that your guitar tone cuts through the mix, which would be perfect for live application. The cocked wah tones are excellent.

    Cons: There was always a slight bit of buzz/hum in the background, no matter which guitar I used, which cables I used, or which setting was dialed in. I sent it in to EHX for repair, and they weren’t able to remove it entirely. I don’t know if this is an issue with all of the them or not. It could just be the nature of the beast, like the Worm. Not a big deal to me really, but worth noting.

    Also, the bass and treble pots do not cut frequencies, they only boost them. When they are set 100% counter-clockwise, they are set to the original signal. In that regard, the TubeEQ is more like a fancy boost than an EQ. For this reason, the TubeEQ will not stand-in for a standard graphic EQ.

    I eventually sold this pedal because I needed the $ to purchase my ’92 Fender Mustang, and it was the pedal least likely to be used often. I already have 2 pre-1983 EHX 10 Band Graphic EQs that I absolutely adore, and plenty of boosted mids options with my LPB-2, Tube Zipper, RI Hot Tubes, and The Worm (in manual mode).

    Summary, buy the TubeEQ if you are looking for a way to find and boost a freq notch on the fly during a performance. Do not buy one if you are hoping to do the same function as a standard graphic EQ.

    #92398
    Quote:
    I had one for about a 6 months.

    Pros: The TubeEQ did a great job of beefing up, and warming up my tone, especially with low ouptut single coils or humbuckers, though it worked well with high output pups as well. Using the expression pedal, you can easily set the notch so that your guitar tone cuts through the mix, which would be perfect for live application. The cocked wah tones are excellent.

    Cons: There was always a slight bit of buzz/hum in the background, no matter which guitar I used, which cables I used, or which setting was dialed in. I sent it in to EHX for repair, and they weren’t able to remove it entirely. I don’t know if this is an issue with all of the them or not. It could just be the nature of the beast, like the Worm. Not a big deal to me really, but worth noting.

    Also, the bass and treble pots do not cut frequencies, they only boost them. When they are set 100% counter-clockwise, they are set to the original signal. In that regard, the TubeEQ is more like a fancy boost than an EQ. For this reason, the TubeEQ will not stand-in for a standard graphic EQ.

    I eventually sold this pedal because I needed the $ to purchase my ’92 Fender Mustang, and it was the pedal least likely to be used often. I already have 2 pre-1983 EHX 10 Band Graphic EQs that I absolutely adore, and plenty of boosted mids options with my LPB-2, Tube Zipper, RI Hot Tubes, and The Worm (in manual mode).

    Summary, buy the TubeEQ if you are looking for a way to find and boost a freq notch on the fly during a performance. Do not buy one if you are hoping to do the same function as a standard graphic EQ.

    Thanks for all the information.
    Kind of a bummer with the noise, that is one the thing i kind of hope it wouldn’t have. Maybe if the tubes were changed it wouldn’t? My intent was to stick it after the wet output of a whammy. I’d been experimenting with a Boss AW-2 after the wet output(The dry and the output of the AW-2 go into a blender pedal) to move around the EQ of the harmonies of the whammy. I thought with Tube EQ I could get this but have more control with the expression. Thanks for your help. :-)

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.