Home Forums Vintage EHX How to date an Electro Harmonix Pedal.

Viewing 14 posts - 16 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #97085
    WatsonWood
    Member

    Maybe this picture can help for a start, if this model corresponds to the Memory Man you have. Otherwise you have to check the serial numbers on the pots.

    The picture comes from:

    http://www.rocknrollvintage.com/products.asp?cat=18&pg=2

    More about the sound later…

    #97098
    sekova
    Member

    Thanks for the reply! The one I have is a Deluxe Memory man, 5-knob, and it looks just like today’s version (the classic chassis, not the new small one:). I checked the pots, and the serialnumbers start with 1377…. so I guess that means they’re made in the 70’s. The reason I’m asking is that I thought the ones from the 70’s and 80’s were all blue, while the reissue was black. So I’m wondering if someone knows when they switched to black color.

    Now that I’ve tested it against a reissue I’ve borrowed from a friend of mine, I actually feel a bit disappointed. I’ve heard that the old pedals are so much better. Turns out it sucks alot more tone than the reissue, and even with the feedback turned all the way up the echo dies after a couple of seconds, while the reissue keeps on echoing forever. In addition it’s really noisy, but I was prepared for that:) The only good thing about the old pedal is that it can handle alot of input level without overloading, but then again I couldn’t get it to self-oscillate no matter what I did.

    I actually like old equipment, so I’m wondering what’s wrong. Is my pedal from a bad year, eventhough it’s and original wintage thing, or is it just broken? It seems to work fine, so I wouldn’t have guessed it’s broken… but somethings not like it should.

    Added a picture of the pedal, and one of the inside.

    Long post, hope somebody bothers to read, and has a good answer:)

    #97100
    Ned Flanders
    Moderator

    137 is the company number (CTS) the 7xxxx is the year and week. So if its 137 7712 its the 12th week of 1977.
    This only tells you when the pots were made by CTS, not when the pedal was made by EHX.

    #97101
    electro-melx
    Moderator
    Quote:
    Now that I’ve tested it against a reissue I’ve borrowed from a friend of mine, I actually feel a bit disappointed. I’ve heard that the old pedals are so much better. Turns out it sucks alot more tone than the reissue, and even with the feedback turned all the way up the echo dies after a couple of seconds, while the reissue keeps on echoing forever. In addition it’s really noisy, but I was prepared for that:) The only good thing about the old pedal is that it can handle alot of input level without overloading, but then again I couldn’t get it to self-oscillate no matter what I did.

    I actually like old equipment, so I’m wondering what’s wrong. Is my pedal from a bad year, eventhough it’s and original wintage thing, or is it just broken? It seems to work fine, so I wouldn’t have guessed it’s broken… but somethings not like it should.

    It sounds to be that it might need re-calibrating, F&EHX4ever; will be the best person to answer that question though….. if he says yes, then he’ll be able to point you in the right direction….. I’m sure he’ll pop in soon.

    #97102
    sekova
    Member
    Quote:
    137 is the company number (CTS) the 7xxxx is the year and week. So if its 137 7712 its the 12th week of 1977.
    This only tells you when the pots were made by CTS, not when the pedal was made by EHX.

    I’m aware of this, but I read on this forum that only the older ehx pedals have pots with numbers on them. Is this wrong?

    As for the recalibration, will this fix the problems I mentioned?

    #97131
    WatsonWood
    Member

    Yes, re-calibrating the pedal will certainly put things to rights. I have owned three vintage MM’s and DMM’s, one of which, with blue and red offset, still survives today and is presently with my EHX repairs techie, Peter Schmidt, getting a complete inspection and refurbishment where necessary. The other two, one of which was with the black offset, were ground into the floorboards of various venues over years of intensive use before being given as well-deserved thank-yous to roadies. The DMM’s served me excellently and had regular inspections once or twice a year for re-calibration. In fact I used to re-calibrate one of them myself before every gig! This is because I was using them between six and ten hours a day on average and needed some very precise set-ups for my sound.So I would not worry at all. EHX pedals are sturdy and made to last and to-day there are highly competent techies capable of putting your DMM back on track, either through advice or, which I highly recommend, through their own craftsmanship.

    First I would go to Howard Davis’ website (formerly Chief Design Engineer for Electro-Harmonix):

    Howard’s website:

    Home Page
    http://howard.davis2.home.att.net/home.htm

    and then to Ron’s website:

    Home Page
    http://www.ronsound.com

    Once you have satisfied yourself with the vast amount of knowledge and experience the website(s) show(s), send an email explaining the situation and Howard or Ron will surely resolve your issues with great mastery as they always do. You can deal with the utmost confidence and you will see that aspects such as weak repeats and noise as well as input calibration can and will be dealt with successfully.
    I put Howard’s link first because I think Ron is a little swamped with work at the moment but do check out his site anyway, it is as fascinating as Howard’s!

    #97133
    Fender&EHX4ever
    Moderator

    Go with WatsonWood’s advice.

    I’ve used several old DMMs, and currently have 3; and the version you have is my favorite generation. It’s the one I use the most. It was never modified. I did the trimpot alignment myself, but I highly recommend letting Howard Davis do that for you. You will be rewarded.

    #97518
    devnulljp
    Participant
    Quote:
    I have a number of ’70s and ’80s EHX pedals. Is there a sequence to the 137… pot code which makes it possible to date the pedals?

    Thanks

    137YYww
    137 = CTS
    YY = year
    ww = week

    So, 1377805 = CTS pot: 1978: 5th week (end Jan/beginning feb)

    EDIT: Just noticed Ned Flanders already gave you this info.

    #97532
    sekova
    Member
    Quote:
    Go with WatsonWood’s advice.

    I’ve used several old DMMs, and currently have 3; and the version you have is my favorite generation. It’s the one I use the most. It was never modified. I did the trimpot alignment myself, but I highly recommend letting Howard Davis do that for you. You will be rewarded.

    Great, thanks for good advice! The only problem is that I live in Norway… sending my pedal to the States and back again might get quite expensive. I do have some friends who are going over there this summer though.

    Do you know anyone in Europe who can do this? Preferably in Norway, but I guess that’s a longshot :)

    #98893
    devnulljp
    Participant

    I’d like some info on what you actually do to calibrate the trimmers.
    Other than hooking it up to an oscilloscope…then what? What do you look for? How do you know it’s right vs.wrong?
    Anyone tried any of the software oscilloscopes like xoscope for this?

    #99027
    ampeg
    Participant

    Just got aboard ,and pulled out my gold colored Big Muff(triangle I think because the volume sustain and tone knobs form a triangle)The pots would indicate 1966, I know thats wrong, what year do you think it is?

    #99019
    devnulljp
    Participant
    Quote:
    Just got aboard ,and pulled out my gold colored Big Muff(triangle I think because the volume sustain and tone knobs form a triangle)The pots would indicate 1966, I know thats wrong, what year do you think it is?

    Gold? You sure it’s not a Sovtek/Civil War/Green (that’s faded)? Could you post pics please? What are the pot codes?

    Triangle Big Muff looks like this:

    0309photof02.jpg

    If you have one that’s gold, that’d be pretty interesting.

    #99046
    ampeg
    Participant

    Thanks , I researched it today , I should know since I bought it new back in the 70’s. It’s a triangle ,the pots say 1966, I considered trading it for a boss rc 20 xl looper from a friend…..is that a good trade? thank you

    #99047
    devnulljp
    Participant
    Quote:
    Thanks , I researched it today , I should know since I bought it new back in the 70’s. It’s a triangle ,the pots say 1966, I considered trading it for a boss rc 20 xl looper from a friend…..is that a good trade? thank you

    eek2.gif

Viewing 14 posts - 16 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.