“Analog Arpeggiator”
Post Reply
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  181
Joined  2008-12-21
Posted: 16 August 2009 10:13 PM | Link to this reply (#16)

Right, but that’s using filter modulation instead of pitch modulation. It might be repeating, but it would still be atonal. Which has its own appeal, but it’d be a very difficult-to-design box.

Fender Rhodes pride!

Quote
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2488
Joined  2008-11-24
Posted: 16 August 2009 11:08 PM | Link to this reply (#17)

well then you could do a step sequencer

Quote
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  181
Joined  2008-12-21
Posted: 19 August 2009 12:03 PM | Link to this reply (#18)

That would be prohibitively expensive…

Fender Rhodes pride!

Quote
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2488
Joined  2008-11-24
Posted: 19 August 2009 02:31 PM | Link to this reply (#19)

not necessarily

Quote
Sr. Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  362
Joined  2009-02-05
Posted: 20 August 2009 02:28 AM | Link to this reply (#20)
julian - 05 August 2009 08:28 PM

This is why some effects just shouldn’t be analog:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFSQ5ZRxlis

The only polyphonic pitch shifter ever made.  It was prohibitively expensive too.

Well, julian, that really sounds über weird! Beyond attractive, I would say. Really more like an electronic washing machine-type effect.
If I remember, it was possible to create S&H arpeggio effects with the EHX Minisynthesizer from 1980.
I agree that any arpeggiator brought out today should be digital.

Robert Wood - After Noon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L203eNHnuPg
Song For The Electric Mistress
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Tmth3kQ80I

Quote
 
Post Reply
 
RSS 2.0 Atom Feed
Electro-Harmonix | www.ehx.com | Blog | Forums | Merch
YouTube.com/ehx | MySpace.com/ehx | Facebook.com/ehx | Twitter.com/ehx